Many arguments rage because of poor definitions to terms. If people cannot agree on a definition, they will not agree on much else. A definition should be definitive – here I will tackle 5 of the most elusive definitions that are at the center of much, if not all, global controversy: Data, Information, knowledge, innovation, wisdom
To state the obvious
It should be obvious that data, information, knowledge, innovation and wisdom are related. The test is simple: if you corrupt one of them, all the others become corrupted. The question becomes; how are they related?
Consider the following definitions
Allow me to provide the following 4 relationships:
1. Information is derived from the productivity of data
2. Knowledge is derived from the productivity of information
3. Innovation is derived from the productivity of knowledge
4. Wisdom is derived from the productivity of innovation
These relationships are very useful.
1. They include everyone, they exclude no one.
2. They are personal enough to reflect individual value system yet discrete enough to not contradicting the value system of another.
The question now resides in how we define productivity, that is a much simpler, more efficient, and far wiser problem to be arguing about. Besides, a singles solution solves 4 problems.