Few people recognize the true economic potential of Wikipedia. Obviously, Wikipedia is an important resource for individuals and profit making companies. It would take Billions of dollars to recreate it from scratch. But the true value of Wikipedia does not end here.
Wikipedia is a really huge set of interconnecting nodes – a massive dynamic database in the commons. When two points are connected, the magnitude and direction of the resulting line provides information about the data and proximity to other data. Wikipedia is a venerable roadmap of connections between significant people, places, things, and ideas. Not unlike the Facebook social graph, Wikipedia in aggregate is a knowledge graph of humanity. It is therefore as perfect a representation of humanity because it was created by humanity.
One of the more effective ways to encrypt data is to hide it among other data. In fact, your personal knowledge graph, stripped of personally identifiable information can be hidden – like a needle in a haystack – among the wikipedia knowledge graph. Your knowledge graph can then extrapolated along the nodes, edges, and paths of Wikipedia to draw inferences, make decisions, or set priorities for yourself and your interaction with the community. It’s like your own private Big Data engine that only you can see.
The idea behind Curiosumé is to develop that vehicle from which a person can interpret actionable information when they overlay a persona (or Proxy) of themselves on the Wikipedia commons. When many people overlay their personas to the Public Wikipedia Haystack, they can specify criteria out of nodes and branches of the wikipedia knowledge graph to find each other, to work together, to learn and teach.
Enter Block Chain
Each owner holds a private key in a cryptographic vault to their proxy that they can share, rent, or retract from others. The Private key is the only way to associate the owner with their proxy and with the commons. Mutual private key exchange will define a market for intangible assets among owners of such assets. This exchange device would be ideally suited for a cryptographic platform such as Maidsafe protocol or Bitcoin Protocol.
Connections, intersections, and resultant “vectors” will reveal patterns from which decisions can be made. The future economy may include the exchange of private keys.
Level Playing Field
As long as proxies – or personas – are anonymized, it would be OK for everyone to have access to them in the commons. In fact, the quantity and the quality of the personas in the commons for a community or location could underwrite the currency of that community. Everyone would have the ability to test their persona in the public domain upon any market to reveal their greatest economic potential. Such a community currency would have a relative value to other communities not unlike, say, Forex.
The community can even test their own combined personas against a host of scenario proxies such as job proxies, investment proxies, etc., all without committing personal information. However, when two or more parties engage in transaction and/or interface with a regulatory agency, they will need to reveal their private key in order for a transaction to pass a pre-established compliance proxy that is also comprised of nodes and branches in the commons.
The Art of War
It would be very difficulty for people to violate another person because they will need access to the other person’s private key as well as a change in the commons in order to formulate a deception. If they modify the commons, they will in fact reveal themselves as a transaction. If a perpetrator can somehow change the other person’s proxy, then they will notify others connected to that proxy of that change. Further, the perpetrator may be unwittingly doing more harm to themselves than good in their own connection to other proxies when attacking a particular persona – any action, except the truthful action, could have implications that are unknowable.
As such, there is little incentive to cheat.
As such, any disputes will be fought in the commons and not at each individual node where the world engages in wars, competition, and oppression today. Wars would be fought in the info commons rather than being shrouded in the fog of ground ops.
The Future of Common Knowledge
The future of common knowledge is the “commons”. If every person, corporation, or institution were to index to a commons based data source, we could all observe each other while maintaining our privacy. Economic scenarios could be run without expending money. Disputes could be handled in the cloud. The maintenance of the commons could become a new form of governance.