“Technological Change Must precede economic growth. We are going about the process of Globalization as if economic growth can precede technological change – this is not sustainable” – D. Robles
The Ingenesist Project is deploying our blockchain based ancillary innovation solution to important projects and institutions in the US. By representing intangible assets as tangible, and using a novel tokenization strategy, ancillary innovation can be equitably deployed thereby restoring the balance between technological change and economic growth.
The successful commercialization techniques of novel ideas or research has evolved over the ages into an elaborate techno-legal-fiscal monstrosity of regulations and gatekeepers. It did not start this way and it may not need to continue this way.
All innovation stands on the shoulder of some prior innovation – e.g., the wheel, wedge, and lever are still ubiquitous in modern life. Innovation has always existed, but was greatly accelerated by the creation of the Scientific Method, considered as one of the most important advancements in human thinking. The Scientific Methods required inventors to determine causation and enforce the discipline of disproving the null hypothesis as a condition of validity.
The Patent system was created in the 1790 and is largely responsible for the industrial revolution by giving inventors a temporary monopoly so that they can develop their works. The cotton gin, the steam locomotive, Portland Cement, the electric generator and propeller were patented during these times. Eli Whitney, Faraday, Edison, The Wright Brothers, Henry Ford all benefited from the patent systems as did society as a whole.
As secondary inventions were built over primary inventions, the velocity of innovation increased dramatically. This cause a financial disconnect where the new inventions could not be funded directly from the revenue generated from prior inventions. Things became more complex in the age of computers and internet where all prior patents could be “re-invented” on a computer of over the Internet ushering an era of very rapid innovation across every industry.
Today, the velocity at which total innovation occurs vastly out-paces the velocity of the mainstream financial means for funding – as was the original intent of the Patent System. The result was an inversion whereas technological change once preceded economic growth providing a means to fund continued innovation. Now “economic growth (capitalization)” must precede technological change in order to fund innovation. This is an unnatural condition that gives rise to various debt related instruments and institutions such as “venture capital” who select winners and losers based on factors that may not be driven by the unity and advancement of society as intended by the patent system.
Most new ideas are abundant, unable to be restrained, dynamic and interdependent. Most ideas include elements of human nature or intangible value that simply cannot be expressed in the legal terms of a patents. There is now a very large gap between the patentable invention and the commercialized invention. Nearly all of the activity in this gap is innovative and intangible in nature, that is; commercializing a novel invention is likewise novel.
Where Secondary Innovation is defined as a new or deliberate application or modification of an existing ideas, methods, or device. Ancillary Innovation refers to the provision of necessary support to the primary activities or operation of an organization, institution, industry, or system. Ironically, ancillary innovation may be the greatest untapped opportunity for primary innovation since the invention of the Patent system.
Commercializing Ancillary Innovation differs in many ways than primary or secondary innovation.
For example, even if a marketing study demonstrates that a primary innovation will fail in a certain demographic, the ancillary innovators were successful regardless of the impact on the primary invention. Killing a bad idea early is the hallmark of Capitalism. In fact, the value of the Ancillary innovation staff becomes increasingly honed with each experience being applied to the next market study until the support professional is regarded as having wisdom.
The nature of statistics is that an experimenter can observe a small sample of normally distributed events, and calculate the probability that the next observation will fall within a prescribed size, condition, performance, etc. Managers are generally characterized by their experience and thus their wisdom I being able to, say, assign the correct allocation of resources or priorities, etc.
Many accelerators, incubators, and venture capital firms serve in the capacity of ancillary innovation. They are run by people whose past experience is sufficiently (statistically) populated with failures and successes such that the probability of success in the ancillary innovation process is increased when given a new set of circumstances.
It is also worth mentioning that the value of the commercializing ancillary innovation far exceeds the value of the commercializing primary innovation, yet it is possibly the least understood. Furthermore, an enormous amount of innovation never reaches fruition for lack of ancillary innovation resources. It seems somewhat odd that so much technological innovation would be allocated to making a mundane passenger vehicle .5 seconds faster on its 0-60 time when the same technology could elevate entire communities from poverty. The difference is the prioritization of ancillary innovation.
Primary originators often receive a very small percentage for their contribution to the ancillary enterprise. The value of the commercializing ancillary innovation may be characterized by the quantity and quality of risk removed from commercialization; as compared to a risk-free hypothetical value of the primary investment alone.
Reasons why most startups fail.
The primary commercialization risks can be taken from a typical list of top reasons why startups fail. The following example is from a VC firm Quake Capital https://medium.com/swlh/the-top-10-reasons-startups-fail-ab3196d70568
Each of these failure modes exist due to an absence of ancillary innovation of some kind. Each requires a deep and highly specialized set of knowledge assets to mitigate. No single experience set can mitigate all of them, and most inventors are lacking most or all of the skills required to cover the ancillary innovation roles.
1. Lack of market need (42%): Metaphorically Is your product a vitamin or a Painkiller.
2. Lack of cash (29%): Many startups run into money problems /short runway.
3. Wrong team (23%): Having a cohesive group of highly motivated, persistent, and diversely skilled people is crucial for startup success
4. Too much competition (19%): A second-mover advantage allows new competitors to quickly capture market share that you helped validate.
5. Pricing issues (18%): Figuring out how to price the product.
6. Poor product (17%): founders sometimes release products that don’t fully appeal to customers.
7. Business model (17%): Lacking a monetization strategy. Failing to find ways to scale.
8. Ineffective marketing (14%): not understanding how to get one’s product into the hands of the target market.
9. Not customer-centric (14%): Many startups fail to obtain customer feedback and act on it.
10. Poor timing (13%): Airbnb’s success can be attributed to its impeccable timing, as it “came out right during the height of the recession when people really needed extra money.
The ancillary innovation process satisfies the demand of the scientific method by forcing the inventor to understand causation and disprove the null hypothesis of failure. These ideals describe the role of the ancillary innovator.
The ability to assemble a specific combination of diverse knowledge assets deployed at the right time and the right place would not only mitigate risk, but if properly measured, would be able to quantify the value of risk mitigation in a tangible form that can be directly monetized.
It is essential that the time required to deploy ancillary innovation is vastly decreased from current methods, systems, and institutions. This is necessary in order to restore the natural and equitable intentions of the Patent system so that primary innovation can directly capitalize its own iterations.
The Ingenesist Project is deploying our Blockchain Based Ancillary Innovation solution to important projects and institutions in the US. By making intangible assets tangible, ancillary innovation can be readily monetized therefore restoring the sustainable balance between technological change and economic growth.